Sustainability is the nature of historic preservation. While preservationists still have a lot of work to do helping the general public, and in many cases, even building professionals, to “get” just how “green” preservation really is, it’s only common sense that historic preservation is the ultimate form of recycling. Rehabilitating old buildings not only reuses materials and keeps them out of landfills, but eliminates a majority of the energy consumption that the process of demolition, landfilling, the production of new materials, and new construction necessitates.

Not to mention that older buildings were often designed and sited to take advantage of environmental factors such as sun, breezes, and elevation, all of which can still be useful in reducing energy consumption in today’s world of modern conveniences.

There’s no question: the greenest building really is the one that’s already built. So as you recycle, reduce, and reuse this Earth Day, consider your built environment- how are are buildings you spend your day in contributing to the environment? If you’re in an older building, chances are, you’re subconsciously celebrating Earth Day everyday, just by being there.

Here are some resources that can help you better understand (and tell the world) how historic preservation and sustainability are intertwined:

Preservation New Jersey’s sustainability webpage- PNJ has gathered links to everything from National Park Service preservation guidelines to an embodied energy calculator, all here on one webpage

The Greenest Building: Quantifying the Environmental Value of Building Reuse
- This 2012 National Trust for Historic Preservation study concludes that, when comparing buildings of equivalent size and function, building reuse almost always offers environmental savings over demolition and new construction.

Weatherization Guide for Older and Historic Buildings
- It’s true, buildings that were built before a time of air conditioning, high-voltage electronics, and modern insulation materials often need help being efficient. Check out this guide for tips on how to help older buildings better conserve energy.

Why Saving Your Old Windows is the Most Sustainable Approach
- Old windows are the most-maligned feature of historic properties. Yet while typical instinct says that older windows need to be replaced, a constantly-growing body of evidence suggests that replacing windows is one of the least green things a property owner can do. Check out the information above, and below, to learn why.

Saving Windows, Saving Money: Evaluating the Energy Performance of Window Retrofit and Replacement
- A 2012 study evidencing that saving historic windows saves not only energy, but money.

Visit the PNJ Facebook page and tell us what recycled historic New Jersey building you’re spending time in this Earth Day!

Image courtesy of Soci@lJumpstart.com

accounts and images of loss and devastation that are pouring out of the Garden State and its neighbors all along the east coast, but that doesn’t make them any easier to take.

As for historic resources, the storm’s impact will take weeks to catalog, but thus far, is unsurprisingly varied. Cape May escaped largely unscathed, and in Wildwood Crest, landmarks like the Caribbean Motel report only very minor roof damage. On the other end of the spectrum, most everyone is aware by now that Seaside Heights’ historic boardwalk was literally obliterated, and the restored Jersey City Terminal in Liberty State Park was inundated with flood waters and winds that took out windows and destroyed exhibits. And with so many people still without electricity, reports from much of the state are slow in coming.

With the help of the New Jersey Historic Preservation Office, PNJ has compiled a list of helpful resources for anyone dealing with the recovery needs of historic properties. Highlights include the National Trust for Historic Preservation‘s resources for homeowners,  the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation‘s list of Federal-level financial assistance for historic preservation projects, and an array of sources of advice on the physical repair of damaged historic properties.

As the shock of Sandy’s impact wears off, and the reality of recovery begins, we preservationists will have a lot of work to do. It will be up to all of us to remind those impacted and those in charge of recovery efforts that historic properties provide opportunities for retaining a community’s identity “before the storm,” that demolition is rarely cheaper than repair, that federal assistance triggers Section 106 review, and so on.

Here at PNJ, New Jersey’s communities and their heritage are our reason for being- the unique sense of place that allows so many worldwide to identify with the loss we’re experiencing right now is the reason we  do what we do. We believe that the visions people get when someone says “Atlantic City” or “Ellis Island” or “the Jersey shore,” and the completely unique environments and experiences places like these offer, are vital to our society, and must be protected. And while there is no preservation ordinance, no grant program, no amount of advocacy that can prevent disasters such as Hurricane Sandy and the damage they cause, there are countless daily, preventable threats to historic places that we can- and will- continue to address, with your help.

Disasters like what we’ve just experienced will always take away irreplaceable historic resources. We can’t prevent these losses, but we can help to mitigate how much they take, both by getting involved and being proactive preservation advocates in the immediate aftermath, and ensuring the lessons learned translate into implementation of the best possible long-term disaster preparedness plans for our historic places.

PNJ wishes New Jerseyans and everyone affected a speedy recovery from Hurricane Sandy, and stands ready to help however we can. We’re here for you, and the places you care about.

Atlantic City’s landmark Boardwalk Hall

In November 2011, Preservation NJ joined the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions, the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, AIA-New Jersey, and Preservation Pennsylvania, in filing an amicus brief in the Third Circuit Court, which was hearing the case of Boardwalk Hall in Atlantic City, on appeal from the U.S. Tax Court.

Boardwalk Hall, one of few historic resources left along the Atlantic City boardwalk and known nationwide as the birthplace of the Miss America pageant in 1921, was restored beginning in 2000 by the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority (NJSEA). In a commonly-used arrangement, a for-profit investor, in this case a subsidiary of Pitney-Bowes, invested $18 million in the project, and thereby became a percentage owner of the limited liability company that owned Boardwalk Hall, with NJSEA retaining the additional ownership. This fairly typical arrangement enabled the for-profit investor to take tax credits on the restoration of Boardwalk Hall- credits that are not applicable to the NJSEA, as a public entity.

In this particular case, substantial measures were taken to both minimize the investor’s risk and ensure a return on their investment. The IRS later challenged these measures in court, claiming the the LLC formed by NJSEA and the investor was a sham, and while the U.S. Tax Court originally ruled that the structure was legitimate and acceptable, the IRS appealed, landing the case in the Third Circuit Court in 2011. In August, the Third Circuit Court overturned the U.S. Tax Court’ ruling.

What appears to have most concerned the Third Circuit Court is the degree to which the deal was structured to shift operating costs away from the investor/NJSEA partnership, while also ensuring the investor a profit, even if the project were to run an operating deficit.  Essentially, the Third Circuit Court found simply that the investor did incur what it considers to be substantial enough risk in order to justify the deal. You can read the full decision here>>

PNJ is working with our partners at Preservation Action and the National Trust to gain further clarity on the overall implications of this case and ruling on the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credit. While many elements of this deal were what’s considered commonplace in the structuring of tax credit projects, there appear to have been some extraordinary arrangements that may mean this ruling has less of an impact on more typical tax credit projects than once feared.

Regardless, it’s clear that the IRS, despite never having provided guidance on the subject,  is now scrutinizing Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credit projects to an unprecedented degree. This could of course result in investor wariness to become involved in such projects- and historic buildings would end up paying the price.

Preservation New Jersey will continue to keep you posted on this case and additional developments regarding the Federal Historic Tax Credit.  For the Boardwalk Hall case, a petition for rehearing would be due by October  11.

Construction Management in the 21st Century: Preserving History with LEED?

Green building advocates and historic preservation supporters have not always seen eye to eye. Take a scenario in 2010, when California lawmakers approved a measure that requires all new construction to meet certain sustainable building standards. The first of its kind in the U.S., this law was lauded by environmentalists, who have encouraged legal support for sustainable building practices. But preservationists say the law could encourage the demolition of historically significant buildings. Many

“The greenest building is the one that’s already built”

sustainability advocates claim the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED certification program represents a key component for solving efficiency problems in the U.S. Yet, as green building under the LEED program continues to expand, battles between sustainability advocates and historical preservationists may be inevitable.

LEED is an acronym developed by the USGBC which stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. The concept behind LEED is to provide a framework for identifying and implementing practical and measurable green building designs, construction and maintenance. LEED committees use a checklist of various measurable criteria to ensure that new buildings maximize energy use. Since its inception, nearly 15,000 companies and organizations in 120 different countries have utilized the LEED program to reduce energy usage and encourage sustainability.

While preservationists agree that sustainability is important, they argue that historic buildings should be retrofitted with their original plans rather than anachronistic modern designs. Long before LEED certification ever existed, preservationists argue, historic buildings were regularly built with sustainable features out of necessity. “When effectively restored, these features can bring about substantial energy savings,” according to the Whole Building Design Group (WBDG). “Taking into account historic building’s original climatic adaptations, today’s sustainable technology can supplement inherent sustainable features without compromising unique historic character.” The WBDG Historic Preservation Subcommittee argues for revising the current version of LEED to better account for the social values and environmental benefits of preserving historic structures.

For buildings that carry historic value, proponents of LEED recommend using the LEED-EB certification for existing buildings. LEED-EB includes a checklist for maximizing the sustainable qualities of existing buildings that can be very effective, yet preservationists maintain that the certification has its oversights. Although LEED encourages concepts like tall, appropriately placed windows to utilize natural light and heat while avoiding mechanical air conditioning, preservationists argue that simple fixes like historically appropriate awnings, which are not featured in LEED’s checklist, can reduce overhead gain by 65% or more, without compromising historical accuracy.

Few academics or preservationists will dispute the importance of energy-efficient building to save costs and maximize our limited resources. Yet, the importance of historic structures can also easily be overlooked in our haste to build for the future. Ingeniously developed architecture has existed for millennia, often in times and places where resources were scarce or difficult to attain. By embracing the tenets of LEED while maintaining the relevant architectural successes of the past, construction managers and architects have the best chance at developing truly innovative, sustainable structures.

From PNJ: There’s lots more that can be said about LEED and historic preservation- what are your thoughts?

The Zabriskie Tenant House, Paramus, 2011

As we preservationists are well-aware, there are a perilous few laws and regulations that have the oversight and teeth necessary to really save historic places. We exist in a world of private property rights and “highest and best use,” wherein the general public is increasingly disillusioned with government regulation, including that of the land use variety. For those of us who deal with these challenges daily, it is always a little surprising when, after preservation tragedies like July 13th’s loss of the 18th century Zabriskie Tenant House in Paramus, so many people repeatedly ask, “How could something like this happen?” But we preservationists must constantly remind ourselves how many people don’t really understand how historic places are “saved-” or how easily they can be lost. We make strides daily, but there is much education yet to be accomplished.

The demolition of the Zabriskie Tenant House, a National Register of Historic Places-listed 18th century stone house that was the oldest surviving link with the thriving 19th century African-American community of Dunkerhook, came as heartbreak to area advocates, who had been working almost two years to save the building. When an application for demolition was filed in 2010, a group of concerned citizens quickly mobilized. The advocates pointed out that the house was included on a list of local landmarks regulated by an ordinance that claims to establish a historic preservation commission in Paramus.

Lesson #1: ANYONE can speak out and make a difference for a historic place. If citizens had not been alert in this case, and taken it upon themselves to do research and generate interest, the Zabriskie Tenant House could easily have been demolished without so much as a question.

In most instances, historic preservation ordinances offer a measure of protection for historic resources. However, it would soon be revealed that the Paramus Historic Preservation Commission hadn’t actually had a member appointed in at least a decade, and the Planning Board that such a commission was supposed to advise was woefully inexperienced with historic preservation concerns.

Lesson #2: Each and every building, community, and situation is different. In preservation, everything is case by case.

The advocates did their homework, and volunteered their time to attend meetings and hearings, send emails, and craft a campaign. They reached out to the property owner and the proposed developer, and worked to educate the municipality. They succeeded in getting the application delayed at least temporarily.

Lesson #3: Preservation is a process. It can involve a lot of effort and time, most of which inevitably falls to volunteers. Even small victories are important steps in the process.

Numerous meetings and hearings, articles, and a 2011 PNJ 10 Most Endangered Historic Places  listing later, in April 2011, the Paramus Planning Board approved a developer’s application to demolish the house, subdivide the property on which it sits and construct two new houses. The Planning Board claimed no legal authority to deny the application, which required no variances. But the questions as to whether the Planning Board could act on a application that involved a site that was supposed to benefit from the oversight of an historic preservation commission, and whether the city could proceed without appointing such a commission (basically, without enforcing their own ordinance), remained.

Lesson #4: Understanding your local land use regulations, or making friends with someone who does, is important.  Ask questions.

Pulling out all of the stops, the local advocates filed a lawsuit challenging the Planning Board’s approval. But the courts upheld the municipality’s approval in September 2011, seemingly unconcerned that Paramus has a law aimed at protecting historic

July 13th, 2012: the Zabriskie Tenant House during demolition

properties that they are not enforcing. Despite this serious blow, advocates continued to work toward alternate solutions. They asked the developer to put the house on the market (which unfortunately never happened), and even devised a plan for the house to be relocated to the campus of Bergen County Community College.

Lesson #5: Never give up. It’s not over, until it’s over.

Throughout the conflict, advocates also continued to generate interest in their case, and publicity. There was even an article on the house in the New York Times. They secured a great deal of support, much of it from surrounding municipalities and the larger preservation community.  However, they did not receive as much vocal support from Paramus residents as they could have used.

Lesson #6: Especially when a municipal law or decision is involved, support from within that municipality is vital. Decision-makers are best influenced by their own constituents.

In the end, even as Bergen County Community College and a County Freeholder continued to work on a potential plan to relocate the house to the college campus, on July 12th, a backhoe appeared at the property, and by noon on July 13th, the Zabriskie Tenant House was largely a pile of rubble.

In losing the Zabriskie Tenant House, we’ve lost an irreplaceable landmark. A piece of rare 18th century heritage, and all but one final remnant of the story of African-Americans in the 19th century Dunkerhook Community of Bergen County, is gone forever. But while lamenting this loss, we have to also take the lessons above, and others, from it, and apply them to the broader picture. Could this happen in your town? What laws and/or processes regulate property in your community, and how invovled are your citizens? Is your municipal leadership educated about historic preservation, and are they being pressed by their constituents to protect historic resources?

For ideas and more information on how you can be proactive about historic preservation where you live, explore PNJ’s Preservation Toolkit. But remember that awareness is the first step. The Zabriskie Tenant House will be missed, but its lessons will survive. Let’s make sure they make a difference.

The Garden State Preservation Trust (GSPT) funds the New Jersey Historic Trust (NJHT), as well as the state’s Green Acres and farmland preservation programs, so without GSPT, we’d be without state-level historic preservation, open space, or farmland preservation grants.

Why should this matter to all preservation devotees throughout New Jersey? Just check out the database of funded projects on the NJHT website for an idea. During the conference session, we asked everyone in the room who was associated with a project that has received any type of Garden State Preservation Trust funding to stand up. Out of approximately 200 people, over three fourths of the room rose.

The NJHT is the most significant source of state-level funding for historic preservation in New Jersey, issuing 693 grants and helping to preserve 477 resources since 1990. This funding enables and incentivises non-profits and public entities to plan for and preserve historic places, creating jobs and leveraging imperative non-state matching investment along the way. NJHT funds have engendered success stories at such diverse sites  as Paulsdale in  Mount Laurel, the First Presbyterian Church of Elizabeth, the Hoff-Vanatta Farmstead in Harmony, and the Essex County Courthouse in Newark.  The loss of this funding would leave a gaping hole in the preservation equation in New Jersey- countless potential future success stories would have nowhere to turn for financial assistance.

Enter the NJ Keep It Green Campaign, a coalition of over 165 statewide, local, and regional groups, mostly conservation and environmental entities, working together to sustain and improve GSPT funding. NJ Keep It Green led successful campaigns to pass ballot measures in 2007 and 2009 that generated a combined $24 million for historic preservation funding in New Jersey- so they come with experience. But they also come with collective expertise, and are always looking to expand that expertise with added members. Preservation New Jersey is an active member of the coalition, along with the New Jersey History Advocates, AIA-New Jersey, the Monmouth County Historical Association the South Jersey Cultural Alliance, and more. The coalition is strengthening bonds between our state historic preservation and environmental communities, and keeping GSPT funding needs in the spotlight, particularly  with our legislators and gubernatorial administration.

Of course, a coalition is only as strong as its members. NJ Keep It Green needs your help to fight for long-term, sustainable funding  for the Garden State Preservation Trust. You can join the campaign, volunteer, and contribute funds to help spread to word. Keep up to date by liking the campaign on Facebook- or become a member and get all the latest information e-mailed right to you! And talk to your legislators about the importance of this funding and the need for their support for replenishing funding in 2013.

The NJHT recently undertook  capital needs survey in an effort to document current historic preservation funding needs statewide. The study identified over $730 million in needs- so there is no doubt that there’s much work to be done. NJHT funding is imperative to the effort  to address these needs, but it will be up to us to work to make sure this funding is a reality in the future.

Visit PNJ’s “Save NJ Historic Trust Funding” page for more info. on the 2009 Bond Act success story and how you can help NJ Keep It Green create another positive outcome this time around>>

this gem is a lot like stepping back in time.

The Mount Tabor Historical Society is working to preserve and promote Mount Tabor‘s unique historic character. An in-progress preservation master plan element will help guide preservation efforts and better integrate preservation with other municipal objectives, while events including concerts at the Tabernacle and an annual house tour that draws thousands, are allowing more and more people to discover and appreciate Mount Tabor each year.  MTHS also acquired the J. Smith Richardson House, an 1873 Second Empire cottage, in 2007. The house remains today largely intact to the 1870s, including such craftsmanship as trompe l’oeil painted recessed-panel walls, ornate original hardware and expansive original glass doors and windows. It is open and interpreted for the public, thanks to MTHS‘ dedication and hard work.

Thanks to everyone who joined us for this exciting day! Your support of PNJ helps us help places like Mount Tabor- together, we’re saving and celebrating New Jersey’s “someplaces!”

PNJ Board Member Margaret Newman leads a walking tour of Mount Tabor, discussing the preservation planning currently underway in the community.

Kastner Mansion, Newark- one of New Jersey’s 10 Most Endangered Historic Places 2012

These are just some of the threats to the resources included on PNJ’s 2012 list of the 10 Most Endangered Historic Places in New Jersey. Each year, our 10 Most Endangered Historic Places program spotlights irreplaceable historic, architectural, cultural and archeological resources statewide that are in imminent danger of being lost. The act of listing these resources acknowledges their importance to the heritage of New Jersey and draws attention to the predicaments that endanger their survival and the survival of all historic resources throughout our state. The list aims to attract new perspectives and ideas to sites in desperate need of creative solutions.

This year’s list is diverse. From a fairy tale amusement park in need of it’s own happy ending in Hamburg, to a 19th century Salem County Insane Asylum ready for rehabilitation, to a Jersey City railroad resource falling apart in the shadow of the Statue of Liberty, to a Somerset County inn that’s hosted over 300 years of history, as always, this year’s list aims to celebrate the vast expanse of significant heritage in the Garden State. Simultaneously, it aims to highlight the varied threats that jeopardize that heritage’s survival, and remind everyone that these same threats, and calls to action, exist in every community statewide.

Previous Most Endangered listees have seen continued or amplified threats in 2011 and 2012: Bergen County funding scheduled for stabilization work at the Hackensack Water Company has been redirected, vandalism and deterioration of resources in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area has increased and is not being addressed, and recent efforts to restore and interpret the Belcoville Post Office appear to again have been abandoned. Additionally, two previous listees have been lost gone forever: the majority of Cape May’s Beach Theatre has been demolished, as has all of Newark’s Polhemus House.

Mount Peace Cemetery, Lawnside- Apathy and encroaching development threaten this place’s historic integrity

However, there’s also incredible progress: Clinton’s 18th century Vought House has been officially acquired by an advocacy group, Mercer County and the state are collaborating to stabilize and interpret Petty’s Run in Trenton, the Penns Grove High School is no longer scheduled for demolition, the McCloughan Mansion has been acquired for restoration. These success stories represent the possibilities that abound for New Jersey’s heritage. We hope that the 2012 list of New Jersey’s 10 Most Endangered Historic Places will serve as a catalyst for positive change and that creative, preservation-conscious solutions will be found for this year’s 10 Most, and many more resources statewide that need attention.

See the 2012 10 Most Endangered Historic Places in New Jersey list here >>

Join PNJ in working to save our state’s incredible historic places!

Tracy & Swartwout Buildings at Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center

This guest blog was written by PNJ intern Lauren Giannullo. Lauren is a graduate student at Rutgers University’s Bloustein School of Public Policy. She is studying for a master’s in City and Regional Planning with a certificate in Historic Preservation. 

After 4 1/2 years of languishing on and off the real estate market, Plainfield’s shuttered Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center (a 2011 PNJ 10 Most Endangered Historic Place) may to be targeted for redevelopment.  Citing what they consider to be unsustainable continued expenses for property maintenance at Muhlenberg, and a dearth of prospective buyers for the site during its time on the market,  owner JFK Health Systems has turned to a different concept : marketing the property as a prime location for new luxury rental housing and retail development, thanks in large part to the transportation options offered by the site’s proximity to the Plainfield train station.

The new redevelopment concept for the site, announced in March, calls for luxury rentals and retail space spread over 11 acres, with continued operation of the satellite emergency room, lab services, and dialysis clinic currently housed on the rest of the property. Initial cost estimates for demolition of the historic Muhlenberg campus have come in at more that $5 million – quite a financial hurdle for any potential buyer.  The good news is that there is no compelling reason for the historic hospital buildings to come down.  Actively used through 2007, these buildings are in good condition and offer an ideal opportunity for rehabilitation to accommodate any new use, including the  apartments or retail space outlined in the new redevelopment plan.

Muhlenberg Hospital, as it was originally known, opened at this location in Plainfield in 1903.  The core of the complex was built by the noted New York architects Tracy & Swartwout that same year; these buildings are some of the earliest examples of the firm’s work.  Over the years the hospital complex expanded, but the original Tracy & Swartwout buildings have remained largely intact.  These buildings serve as a living history of the people who worked to improve health care in New Jersey, and provide a tangible link to the community’s past.  Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center closed its doors in 2007 amid much controversy- the historic Muhlenberg buildings have remained vacant since that time.

Preservation New Jersey strongly urges recognition of the significance of Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center‘s historic buildings to both the city of Plainfield and the state of New Jersey by JFK Health Systems and any prospective site developers.  In light of the dwindling number of extant historic medical complexes in the state, the importance of this site in terms of the history of health care and the medical field, and the noteworthy architects involved in the buildings’ creation, it is of critical importance that these structures be maintained and reused productively within any new redevelopment scheme.  Demolition of these buildings would be a detriment to the community and its history, not to mention a waste of money and energy on demolition and landfilling.  The historic significance of the Tracy & Swartwout buildings on the property can only serve to enhance future plans for this property: any redevelopment here will need “curb appeal” just as much as any other development. In the extant historic Muhlenberg Campus, this property has something that sets it apart- an opportunity to create a one-of-a-kind mixed use development unlike others on offer throughout the state.

The models of successful historic hospital rehabilitation  abound; there’s the former City Hospital in St. Louis, MO; the former Jersey City Medical Center, currently undergoing rehabilitation in Jersey City; and the former Eitel Hospital in Minneapolis, MN, just to name a few. These are not your everyday complexes, and Muhlenberg doesn’t have to be, either. Let’ hope JFK Health System wants Plainfield to have a successful, “stand out” redevelopment at Muhlenberg as much as we do!

In preparation for Federal Preservation Lobby Day 2012, Preservation Action is keeping us up-to-date on how preservation is faring in FY 2013 federal budget discussions. President Obama released his 2013 budget proposal last week, and as PA relays, this proposal is just the beginning of the lengthy process that will determine federal-level preservation funding during the coming year. From Preservation Action:

The President’s proposal for preservation spending in FY 2013:

Funding for the Historic Preservation Fund would remain level with the FY12 enacted amount of $55.9 million. With last year’s elimination of Save America’s Treasures and Preserve America, State Historic Preservation offices, Certified Local Governments, Tribal Historic Preservation Offices, and Tribal Heritage Grants are the only programs funded out of the HPF. Preservation advocates continues to lobby Congress for full funding for the HPF as well as a competitive bricks and mortar grant program to be funded from the HPF and administered by the States (want to help? Join us at Federal Preservation Lobby Day,  coming up March 8!).

The President has once again proposed cutting National Heritage Area (NHA) funding in half to $9.3 million, once again citing a lack of criteria and programmatic language for NHAs. To address this issue, the National Alliance of Heritage Areas has been working on the introduction of the Heritage Area Act of 2012, currently seeking original sponsors to join Charles Dent (R-PA), and Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY). A Dear Colleague letter is available for circulation to your Representatives.

Under the President’s budget, many of the Federal Highway Programs would be consolidated into five broad categories. Transportation Enhancements, Scenic Byways, and Historic Covered Bridge Preservation would likely fall in to the new “Livability” category and compete with several other programs for $4 billion in funds in 2013 and $27 billion for the following six years. This program is very similar to the one proposed in the President’s 2012 budget. This approach, however, does not mirror any of the the new transportation law proposals being considered in the House or Senate.

Of particular note in the National Park Service budget is a $24 million cut from their construction budget. With a $3 billion backlog in deferred maintenance on more than 27,000 National Register listed sites, this is cause for great concern.

As indicated in the chart above, overall preservation funding requests for 2013 from the President are down slightly from 2012 request levels.  That said, the requests largely mirror FY 2012 spending levels,  save for the proposed drastic reduction in NHA funding.

As the annual Federal Preservation Lobby Day event approaches, issues around federal preservation funding take on a heightened level of immediate importance.  Lobby Day provides a chance for preservation advocates to meet with their federal representatives and make a case for preservation funding support – it’s an incredible opportunity to be a voice for the preservation community.  Please join us on Capitol Hill on Thursday, March 8th!  Contact Preservation NJ if you’d like to get involved in this and other efforts to garner support for federal preservation funding.